When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
I fully agree with the claim that there is no correlation between success and luck. Moreover, Iunderstand success to refer to one's ability to achieve the predominant part of his goals in hislifetime, which in turn leads to a correlation between success and income since theaccomplishment of such a natural goal as to provide a good future for your loved ones demandsthe means. What is the simplest and most lawful way to earn enough to consider yourself asuccessful person? To receive a good education and to find a good job. Both receiving aneducation and making a career presuppose one's readiness to work hard, and success without hardwork is simply not possible for the vast majority of the world's population. The reasons andexamples listed below will strengthen my point of view.
First of all, considering an education and a career as key factors of success, one will choose topursue a degree from a college or a university. One wishing to be admitted to the university willhave to take several tests. It is doubtful that someone will be so lucky that knowing nothing, hecould pass the test with a high score. A low score means failure, and that test taker will not likelybe admitted. Therefore, in order to be successful, one should prepare for the tests and work hard,because a good education will provide him with a good job and an opportunity to accomplishsome of his goals and dreams. In my lifetime, I have never met a person who could graduate froma college without working hard.
Secondly, it is impossible to make a career if one is indolent and lacking knowledge, at least indeveloped countries. Luck plays no role in achieving this success. Even if someone wasunbelievably lucky enough to become a manager not being qualified enough, he will be asked toresign in the near future because of his inability due to lack of knowledge and experience to makeright decisions. For instance, I used to work for a very small company owned by a friend. Thiscompany was later closed because of bankruptcy. The cause of bankruptcy was wrong strategiesand decisions made by the owner. After the failure, he went to a university and worked foranother company so that he could obtain experience and become a successful businessman.Nowadays, he considers himself a successful person because he had turned into reality his twobiggest dreams of producing consumer goods of high quality and making charitable donations toneedy people.
In sum, as long as someone understands success as an ability to turn into reality some of hisdreams and goals, he will have to work hard because he will need money. And his chances to earnthat money will remarkably increase if he could graduate from a college and make a career. All ofthese things are simply not possible without hard work. Luck has no place in such a scheme ofevents.
There is a humorous saying in English – “The grass is always greener on the other side of thevalley”. The saying is used ironically to point out that there is a temptation in us all to insist thatothers are more fortunate than we are. This is nowhere more true than on the question of luck andhard work. When faced with the “bad times”, we often find comfort in the idea that we arespecial in our degree of misfortune. I feel that such an attitude is negative, and that it can bringonly further misfortune.
Many famously successful people have begun from small origins. Mao was the son of a (modestlyprosperous) peasant; the explorer Captain Cook was so poor that, as a child, he had to work byday and study by night; many of the affluent Americans of today are the children of the poorimmigrants of yesterday. Beethoven, it should be remembered, became deaf before the end of hiscareer. There are many, many more people who have also made genuine, though Jess spectacular,successes against the odds.
Within his own terms, a person who is born into poverty in India is a great success if he managesto own a house in later life. Poverty cannot be reduced by merely complaining and blamingothers: no matter how guilty other people are, each individual must reach out to success forhimself. Indeed, some economists believe that the world operates by what they call “the rule ofthe jungle”. They believe that in economics a person a1ways attempts to gain profit from hisneighbor: that given the chance the poor man would quickly make himself rich by trading to hisown advantage.
Also, it is presumptuous to judge another according to his or her apparent fortune. No man canever truly understand the sufferings of his neighbor. A man who appears comfortably rich mayhave suffered elsewhere in his life - through the death of a loved one, for example. Retiredbusinessmen have often worked long hours in their youth. Surely, it must be wiser to respectachievement than to deny that anyone has achieved good in the world.
To rely on notions of luck - to believe that life is a kind of lottery - is an attempt to escape reality.Paradoxically, the only time a person can claim that luck is more important than work is when hereflects on his own success. Because of that modesty, the great man then becomes even greater.
Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others thinkthat it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons to developyour essay.
Most of us can learn how to do something simple on our own with just a set of instructions.However, to learn about something more complex, it's always best to have a teacher.
Teachers bring with them varied and useful backgrounds. They've been trained to teachindividuals in different ways depending on their style. For instance, some students learn better bydiscussing a topic. Others learn more by writing about it. Teachers can help students learn in theway that's best for each student. A textbook or a manual can only give you one way of learningsomething. Plus they're only as helpful as your ability to understand them. A good teacher canadapt her teaching to your needs.
Teachers help you focus on what you're learning. If you're learning something by yourself, it'seasy to become distracted and go on to other activities. Teachers keep your attention on thesubject. They also approach a subject logically, taking it one step at a time. On your own, it'stempting to skip parts of the learning process you think you don't need. That can hinder your ability to really understand the subject.
Learning a subject on your own is a very narrow way of learning. You can only use theinformation you get from the textbook. With a teacher, you get the information in the writtenmaterials as well as the teacher's own knowledge of the topic. Teachers can also provide extramaterials to broaden the scope of what you're learning.
There's nothing wrong with studying on your own, and a learner can always benefit from somequiet study. For the best possible learning, though, a good teacher is the biggest help you can have.