1. What is the lecture mainly about?
A. The influence of Incan culture on later Peruvian civilizations
B. The significance of archaeological findings in a region of Peru
C. The controversy surrounding a new method of archaeological research
D. The renovation of rectangular pyramids found in Peru
2. Why does the professor discuss the Aspero site in Peru?
A. To provide evidence of an ancient Peruvian culture's knowledge of irrigation techniques
B. To point out that the Aspero pyramids are different from those found at other Norte Chico sites
C. To explain a belief about Peruvian history that was later challenged
D. To clarify which of the twenty residential centers in the Norte Chico region was the largest
3. What is the professor's opinion about the current archaeological classification of the Norte Chico culture?
A. The culture should be considered complex in spite of the unusual way it developed.
B. The culture seems to have followed the pattern that is typical of other major ancient civilizations.
C.The failure of the culture to produce ceramic pottery indicates a lack of advancement.
D. More evidence is needed before the culture can be classified into one of the existing categories.
1. According to the professor, what crop was NOT cultivated by the ancient inhabitants of the Norte Chico region
2. What does the professor imply about the significance of the khipu that were produced by the Norte Chico culture?
A. They represent the culture's first attempts at creating fabric.
B. They confirm the importance of cotton in the regional economy.
C. They suggest that early inhabitants of the region's coastal areas used fishing nets.
D. They may constitute one of the earliest known forms of written communication.
3. What does the professor say about how the city of Caral came to an end?
A. People moved to the coast to have greater access to the ocean's resources.
B. Outside enemy forces invaded the city.
C. The city's inhabitants initiated a rebellion.
D. The city's inhabitants abandoned the city in an organized manner.
Narrator: Listen to part of a lecture in an archaeology class.
Professor: If I asked you to name an ancient civilization from Peru,
many of you might say the Incas. But let s consider instead the impact of a mysterious culture in north central Peru that thrived in a collection of valleys called the Norte Chico region. Archaeologists have been finding evidence that suggests that Norte Chico is the region where the
early inhabitants of South America first began a pivotal transition from being hunters and gatherers and formed a complex and substantially developed society. This would be around 3,000 BCE, well before the Incas even existed. These sites were so advanced that nothing like them could be seen anywhere else in the Americas at the time. There' s no official name for the culture yet, but it seems that its architecture and development had a profound influence on subsequent culture in the Americas for thousands of years afterwards. At each site, archaeologists have identified one or more enormous platform mounds, sort of like rectangular-terraced pyramids, throughout the whole region, people were organized enough to plan and produce these large terraced pyramids, something the Americas have never seen before. And each of the sites apparently served as a residential center, so people lived and worked there. It seems they were farmers.
Now, this collection of over twenty residential centers is very exciting for a number of other reasons as well. For one thing, their existing has called into question a previous theory about how complex society emerged in the Americas. You see, in the 1970s and 80s, archaeologists had examined a coastal site in Peru called Apsero. Aspero was one of the first of these sites in Norte Chico to be discovered and studied extensively. That was about 40 years ago. It' s direct丨y on the coast and has these same mounds dating from the same period, about 3000 BCE. Apparently, Aspero was a fishing village and based on this fact, archaeologists concluded that the first complex society was based on and sustained by ocean and marine resources without agriculture. They didn't know yet, though that Aspero was just one of many such sites in the region and most of these other sites were inland, quite a distance away from the coast. But now we know that all these inland sites exist and that they were all built around the same time.
Another exciting thing about this recent research is that it calls into question some long-held assumptions about how complex societies developed. You know, when we work with any ancient society and consider its classification, a standard traditional hallmark used to classify the culture as complex is the presence of ceramic pottery. The other major birthplaces of complex civilizations around the world like Egypt or Mesopotamia, they all had pottery, but did this mysterious culture provide us with evidence of ceramic pottery? No, this culture is unconventional in that respect.
Researchers have also discovered mechanical remains of domesticated plants including cotton, squash, chili, beans, and avocados. But interestingly, they found almost no evidence of preserved corn or other grains. This means that this early culture developed not only without pottery, but also without a staple grain-based food, which is usually the first large-scale agricultural product of complex societies. So here again, the ancient Peruvians took a different path to civilization.
Additionally, in one specific archaeological site, Caral, they've uncovered artifacts called khipu. Basically, a khipu is an intricate collection of hanging strings, cotton string of many colors. Each khipu strings contains an elaborate combination of color and design that communicates meaning. Each one has a wide variety of special intricately tied knots. People transmitted information in this manner. There was meaning associated with the color selected, the knot used, the fiber chosen. There are even those that speculate it may have been a writing system. Interestingly, the 3,000 inhabitants of this one particular city, Caral, appeared to left. Why? Well, here's what we know. There doesn't appear to be any evidence of invasion from outside enemy forces. There were no signs of rebellion from the
people who lived there. What we see instead is an orderly process whereby the occupants covered the buildings with substantial amounts of gravel and pebbles and then were gone.